What can the Nobel Prize winning physicist"s story teach you?

What can the Nobel Prize winning physicist"s story teach you? OR What did Frank Kern learn the hard way?

First, before I get into the story itself, let"s ponder the meaning of teaching so we are on the same page, shall we?

As someone who attempts to teach, let me tell you what it"s like for me: I find a thousand different ways to say, demonstrate, frame what I want to teach. I invent thousand and one stories, I find books that hint on what I want to teach, I sing it, I make it a comedy, make it a tragedy, I make you read, I make practice activating your eye muscles and the related brain areas...

And if I do it long enough with enough enthusiasm, I may get a few people to learn what I teach... but most of the time it is a real uphill battle.

So what I mean to convey: teaching doesn"t equal learning.

For the ones not learning it is all the teacher"s fault... But the poor teacher...

Actually the poor teacher can get really rich because of it.

Here is a great example: Frank Kern has been teaching for about 19 years without anyone really EVER learning what he is teaching.

At first he was raking it in, because the methods he taught didn"t get fully learned by his customers.

They cried bloody murder, and the FCC listened to the accusers, and changed the game for everyone, and took everything away from Kern.

Then he came back, told the story on stage, and started to teach more, but this time saying: he cannot promise because he isn"t allowed to, by the FCC.

People were buying his products like hotcake, yours truly included, and if they were really special, with some personal help from Kern, they produced noteworthy but flash in the pan result.

Flash in the pan results mean: you didn"t learn what was being taught.

If you listen to/watch a Frank Kern video, you may get to the level of understanding. Not all, but a nice number of people do.

Then what happens? You run into snags when you try to do what he teaches you to do.

So you complain... you say he deceived you.

Frank get enough of FCC trouble back when, so he changes his business model, and... gasp: continues teaching, now for free, and takes on a few clients and starts teaches them... and even those big money, successful clients can"t duplicate his teaching... or not quite.

So what he is doing now, if he deems you and your business a good choice for his teaching, he teaches you one thing and monitors your doing or that one thing... and gets paid handsomely for it.

Can all of those clients do what he tells them to do? Hell no... not exactly. Which means not the kinds of results your business can produce.

So he moves one step further from teaching, and creates a do it for you agency... again big freaking bucks... and still some not so great results.

All the while, he gives away his simple sounding advice, for free... without any concern that you"ll get something for nothing.

Now, why is that that he now doesn"t charge for what he used to sell for a lot of money?

So here comes the story of the Nobel price winning physicist who taught at a famous university:

When interviewed he shook his head sadly: it is hard to find any student for my graduate course to whom I can teach to do physics. ((His weeding technique for suitable candidates was this: he would ask them why they were wearing the jacket they were wearing to the interview. Depending on how they answered,  he could gauge their creativity... I often use the same method, and find later that creativity is missing for the person.))

Why? asked the interviewer? Because they learned physics, what they think they know, while I "invented" physics, what I want to teach.

Learning means: you get someone else"s knowledge, and you think you know it.

But when you test it, you cannot build on it, you cannot use it... you can only regurgitate it.

Why? it is second hand knowledge, what is also called Tree of Knowledge.

• 
  

  The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.

  
  


• 
  

  What I cannot create, I do not understand.

  
  


• 
  

  For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

  
  

The process to make it your own is a creative process, where you make the second hand knowledge your own.

I call it "connecting the dots". Others call it creativity. You can also call it "play".

It depends on opening up "spiritual" capacities in your DNA, capacities like recognizing patterns accurately, and the ability to look widely and see unrelated areas of life in the same glance, so you can see the same pattern in more than the area you first saw it.

And the ability and the willingness to lose your agenda... agenda, any agenda, narrows your cone of vision, narrows your ability to see what is outside of the agenda.

The other thing that it depend on is how much knowledge you have in how many different areas of life, science, industry, art, politics, humanities, etc.

If you don"t have enough, if your world is small, then you won"t have a chance to connect too many dots.

The Nobel Prize winning physicist and I have one thing in common and that is this: when we were young, we both went on vacation with a book that had a companion book with the solutions. Mine was mathematics, his was physics... I guess.

What I cannot create, I do not understand.

And both him and myself spent the whole vacation inventing the solutions to the problems in our book...

It change me, to my core. It changed my attitude forever. From thereon I was never satisfied with explanations, or being shown solutions... I had to invent my own... until I got to marketing.

There I found an impenetrable wall. I found myself without any tools to invent my own solutions...

I found that my world was severely limited by my inability to ask good questions, to create boundaries that make the solutions pop out.

It turns out that this, the ability to limit the view at will, not in its width, not in its depth, but in its "resolution" i.e. its particle size or its relevance is everywhere...

• It"s there when I muscle test for missing nutrients.


• It"s there when I muscle test for the "healing" diet


• It"s there when I want to isolate what sensation in my body would give me answer to the question: what"s going on that I feel this or that?


• And, it"s there when I have no idea how to answer the marketing questions that would enable me to give a direction to my marketing.

I have spent a week, maybe two watching video after video, Frank Kern"s videos, TED talks, being really curious to find some answers why I am such an incompetent fool in marketing.

And yesterday I suddenly saw what Frank Kern does... so now I can put some effort in going from consciously incompetent fool, to consciously competent, and maybe even unconsciously competent with enough practice.

Even if it takes blood, sweat and tears, it is exciting. It is exhilarating, to tell you the truth.

Once you start connecting the dots, the world is your oyster, in that area... the number of dots you can connect... area.

Otherwise your knowledge is like little island nations warring for dominance, all saying that they are the most important to your success in life.

If you are sure, you are an arrogant fool

If you look at the number of TED talks that say: the one thing, the most important piece of knowledge, what you miss... the answer... you can see all the people who don"t have a network of knowledge, who don"t have dots to connect, who live in a small world and ignore the rest... narrow cone of vision, no curiosity, even the Nobel Prize winning speakers... sorry to break it to you.

In my programs I endeavor to take you through the phases to enable you to connect the dots: to acquire the abilities, turn on the spiritual capacities to be able to connect the dots.

But, honestly, I am contemplating abandoning teaching, or making it completely free (and ineffective) and taking on clients for whom I can do, or direct them to do one limited thing and keep an eye on how they do it.

No need to understand... just do it, and rake it in.

While I may keep on some private clients whom I can practice what I can do to turn "human being" on.

What can the Nobel Prize winning physicist"s story teach you?

What can the Nobel Prize winning physicist"s story teach you? OR What did Frank Kern learn the hard way?

First, before I get into the story itself, let"s ponder the meaning of teaching so we are on the same page, shall we?

As someone who attempts to teach, let me tell you what it"s like for me: I find a thousand different ways to say, demonstrate, frame what I want to teach. I invent thousand and one stories, I find books that hint on what I want to teach, I sing it, I make it a comedy, make it a tragedy, I make you read, I make practice activating your eye muscles and the related brain areas...

And if I do it long enough with enough enthusiasm, I may get a few people to learn what I teach... but most of the time it is a real uphill battle.

So what I mean to convey: teaching doesn"t equal learning.

For the ones not learning it is all the teacher"s fault... But the poor teacher...

Actually the poor teacher can get really rich because of it.

Here is a great example: Frank Kern has been teaching for about 19 years without anyone really EVER learning what he is teaching.

At first he was raking it in, because the methods he taught didn"t get fully learned by his customers.

They cried bloody murder, and the FCC listened to the accusers, and changed the game for everyone, and took everything away from Kern.

Then he came back, told the story on stage, and started to teach more, but this time saying: he cannot promise because he isn"t allowed to, by the FCC.

People were buying his products like hotcake, yours truly included, and if they were really special, with some personal help from Kern, they produced noteworthy but flash in the pan result.

Flash in the pan results mean: you didn"t learn what was being taught.

If you listen to/watch a Frank Kern video, you may get to the level of understanding. Not all, but a nice number of people do.

Then what happens? You run into snags when you try to do what he teaches you to do.

So you complain... you say he deceived you.

Frank get enough of FCC trouble back when, so he changes his business model, and... gasp: continues teaching, now for free, and takes on a few clients and starts teaches them... and even those big money, successful clients can"t duplicate his teaching... or not quite.

So what he is doing now, if he deems you and your business a good choice for his teaching, he teaches you one thing and monitors your doing or that one thing... and gets paid handsomely for it.

Can all of those clients do what he tells them to do? Hell no... not exactly. Which means not the kinds of results your business can produce.

So he moves one step further from teaching, and creates a do it for you agency... again big freaking bucks... and still some not so great results.

All the while, he gives away his simple sounding advice, for free... without any concern that you"ll get something for nothing.

Now, why is that that he now doesn"t charge for what he used to sell for a lot of money?

So here comes the story of the Nobel price winning physicist who taught at a famous university:

When interviewed he shook his head sadly: it is hard to find any student for my graduate course to whom I can teach to do physics. ((His weeding technique for suitable candidates was this: he would ask them why they were wearing the jacket they were wearing to the interview. Depending on how they answered,  he could gauge their creativity... I often use the same method, and find later that creativity is missing for the person.))

Why? asked the interviewer? Because they learned physics, what they think they know, while I "invented" physics, what I want to teach.

Learning means: you get someone else"s knowledge, and you think you know it.

But when you test it, you cannot build on it, you cannot use it... you can only regurgitate it.

Why? it is second hand knowledge, what is also called Tree of Knowledge.

• 
  

  The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.

  
  


• 
  

  What I cannot create, I do not understand.

  
  


• 
  

  For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

  
  

The process to make it your own is a creative process, where you make the second hand knowledge your own.

I call it "connecting the dots". Others call it creativity. You can also call it "play".

It depends on opening up "spiritual" capacities in your DNA, capacities like recognizing patterns accurately, and the ability to look widely and see unrelated areas of life in the same glance, so you can see the same pattern in more than the area you first saw it.

And the ability and the willingness to lose your agenda... agenda, any agenda, narrows your cone of vision, narrows your ability to see what is outside of the agenda.

The other thing that it depend on is how much knowledge you have in how many different areas of life, science, industry, art, politics, humanities, etc.

If you don"t have enough, if your world is small, then you won"t have a chance to connect too many dots.

The Nobel Prize winning physicist and I have one thing in common and that is this: when we were young, we both went on vacation with a book that had a companion book with the solutions. Mine was mathematics, his was physics... I guess.

What I cannot create, I do not understand.

And both him and myself spent the whole vacation inventing the solutions to the problems in our book...

It change me, to my core. It changed my attitude forever. From thereon I was never satisfied with explanations, or being shown solutions... I had to invent my own... until I got to marketing.

There I found an impenetrable wall. I found myself without any tools to invent my own solutions...

I found that my world was severely limited by my inability to ask good questions, to create boundaries that make the solutions pop out.

It turns out that this, the ability to limit the view at will, not in its width, not in its depth, but in its "resolution" i.e. its particle size or its relevance is everywhere...

• It"s there when I muscle test for missing nutrients.


• It"s there when I muscle test for the "healing" diet


• It"s there when I want to isolate what sensation in my body would give me answer to the question: what"s going on that I feel this or that?


• And, it"s there when I have no idea how to answer the marketing questions that would enable me to give a direction to my marketing.

I have spent a week, maybe two watching video after video, Frank Kern"s videos, TED talks, being really curious to find some answers why I am such an incompetent fool in marketing.

And yesterday I suddenly saw what Frank Kern does... so now I can put some effort in going from consciously incompetent fool, to consciously competent, and maybe even unconsciously competent with enough practice.

Even if it takes blood, sweat and tears, it is exciting. It is exhilarating, to tell you the truth.

Once you start connecting the dots, the world is your oyster, in that area... the number of dots you can connect... area.

Otherwise your knowledge is like little island nations warring for dominance, all saying that they are the most important to your success in life.

If you are sure, you are an arrogant fool

If you look at the number of TED talks that say: the one thing, the most important piece of knowledge, what you miss... the answer... you can see all the people who don"t have a network of knowledge, who don"t have dots to connect, who live in a small world and ignore the rest... narrow cone of vision, no curiosity, even the Nobel Prize winning speakers... sorry to break it to you.

In my programs I endeavor to take you through the phases to enable you to connect the dots: to acquire the abilities, turn on the spiritual capacities to be able to connect the dots.

But, honestly, I am contemplating abandoning teaching, or making it completely free (and ineffective) and taking on clients for whom I can do, or direct them to do one limited thing and keep an eye on how they do it.

No need to understand... just do it, and rake it in.

While I may keep on some private clients whom I can practice what I can do to turn "human being" on.

The field: The invisible distinction that defines your consciousness

We look at life through the space we locate ourselves in.

When you go home for the holidays, you have a space inside which you interact with your mother. You have a space inside which you interact with your father, another space with your siblings.

Some people live their whole life out of one favorite space.

When you know what space you think you are in, and the other person makes no sense, that is because they relate to you inside a different space.

For example, Nancy lives inside Mother-child space. She is either the mother, or she is the child. When she is the child, I am either the mother (she loves that) or Not mother... she hates that. When she is the mother and I refuse to be the child, she throws a tantrum.

This is invisible for her. It"s the water she swims in.


When a coaching relationship doesn"t work, i.e. it is unpleasant, it is forced, it is ineffective, it is always because the two people are in a different space...

My intention is to operate, interact with a student inside the space of partnership. I have my job cut out for me... and I fail more often than not to move them to the space of partnership.

In the Landmark Partnership Course participants got a glimpse of partnership after a whole year of learning to recognize, learning to distinguish all the 16 different spaces that don"t allow for partnership.

Inside the space for Mother-Child partnership isn"t recognized. The mother and the child are NEVER in a partnership: their self interest is sharply different. In fact: partnership there is rejected. It is resented. Same in Father-child... or playmate-sibling, which is yet another space...

Becoming curious (and observant, aware) about the self-interest and the many forms of it is incredibly useful and makes seeing why these relationships lack harmony or growth potential.

You can practice recognizing the self interest (without making it right or making it wrong) any and every place in your life, even in books, or TV shows. Everywhere.

Self interest conflicts with another"s self-interest... because self-interest lives as an either I win or you win phenomenon. Validating self-interest, the other"s self interest, is one way you can take the sting out of relationships and bring them closer to partnership and workability. [note]More on validation: https://www.yourvibration.com/33924[/note]

I am not licensed to teach the Partnership Course, or any Landmark Course, so this is pretty much as much as I can "quote" from the course, without violating my non-compete agreement with the company.

But if you are astute enough what I have written so far is going to make you look. See what space you do your life, do your relationships from.

When things don"t work... you can safely assume that you are in the wrong quadrant, you are in the wrong room, you are in the wrong space.

Identifying where you are at, and where the other is takes practice, but is easy.

Then make the conversation move to another space takes a lot more. A whole lot more. It takes the art of communication.

I"ve recruited seven different people for the experimental communication training. The goal is to make life work, no matter how different they are. No matter what space they hang out most. No matter what they want to accomplish.

Moving people, moving the conversation to another space where there can be alignment, real communication, love, harmony, and ultimately partnership is what I intend to teach.

You, who are not in the course, you can do your work to identify what space you have your conversations in.

The Partnership Course, a fully Tree of Life phenomenon, gets to a deep knowledge through using collages, the non-verbal tactile, kinesthetic representation of a field. [note]There are four "ordinary" fields of relating, values and communication: 1. mother/child 2. father/child 3. playmate/sibling, 4. admirer/admired. (Here are a few collages of someone I don"t know on Flickr. Hover over the images to see which quadrant, which space, which field it shows. )

The fifth field, the field of partnership, cannot be jumped into. It can only be accessed when all the values of the four quadrants, the four ordinary fields, are transcended... i.e. seen but not operational. 1~2 out of a hundred is willing to do the work... We shall see how many in a tiny course I am leading. I am shooting for 50% or more[/note]

Ingenious.

Of course, most of the people in the course first had the thought and then made a collage to illustrate it. Meaning: they stayed on the Tree of Knowledge.

Getting of that tree is not easy... no matter what tool you use.

Most artists create "art" on the Tree of Knowledge too... even though art is not a Tree of Knowledge, word thing.

In this article I have given you a whiff of how to alter your life, on the Tree of Life. The trimtab method, where gentle and small changes turn around your oceanliner... and your life towards workability and towards growth and fulfillment.

As long as you live inside one of those quadrants, uneven quadrants, ordinary communication, workability and fulfillment will be there only for moments, and only as an accident.

When you become intimately familiar with how you and others live their lives inside those tightly defined spaces, you"ll have a choice to stay there, live a limited and predictable life, or to take charge, and direct all your communications to the open water, what we"ll call, maybe, partnership... maybe alignment with all of it...

Haven"t decided yet.

PS: I just realized why people like animals, pets more than people: animals, your choice of animals, allow you to dominate to your hearts content... people don"t...

NEW: On courage... just one of the profound misunderstandings of humanity

http://yourvibration.com/pix/wp-content/uploads/8f80Taijitu_red-300x300.png



RSS Feed Powered by MaxBlogPress Bring My Blog Visitors Back





View original article - 

On courage... just one of the profound misunderstandings of humanity

CLICK TO CONTINUE

NEW: Updated: What is Source"s Take on Negativity? Prepare To Be Surprised!

http://www.yourvibration.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/negativity-stuck.png
People talk about positive and negative, positivity, negativity, and other Law of Attraction b.s. but they are completely misdirected, mistaken, shallow and involved in magical thinking.

The only real divisions of "content" when it comes to your mind, your actions, your emotions, your intentions, your context and principles: is it from the Tree of Life or from the Tree of Knowledge, or said in an even simpler way: is it reality or is it unreality, is it a fact or is it a fiction.

CLICK TO CONTINUE